Betekenis van:
grand national

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. The Grand National
2. The Grand National The Derby
3. The Irish Grand National and the Irish Derby
4. The Irish Grand National and the Irish Derby are the most important horse races in Ireland.
5. The Belgian Formula 1 Grand Prix has a special general resonance as it promotes an especially beautiful Belgian circuit, which is an object of particular national pride.
6. Liechtenstein: the expression “Appellation d'origine contrôlée”, “AOC”, “Kontrollierte Ursprungsbezeichnung” or “KUB” accompanying the designation of origin, and for quality wines with additional quality attributes “Auslese Liechtenstein”, “Sélection Liechtenstein” or “Grand Cru Liechtenstein” according to national legislation.”
7. Liechtenstein: the expression “Appellation d'origine contrôlée”, “AOC”, “Kontrollierte Ursprungsbezeichnung” or “KUB” accompanying the designation of origin, and for quality wines with additional quality attributes “Auslese Liechtenstein”, “Sélection Liechtenstein” or “Grand Cru Liechtenstein” according to national legislation.” ;
8. Wines allowed to the national seal ‘Marque nationale’ can also carry one of the additional quality designations: ‘Vin classé’, ‘Premier cru’ or ‘Grand premier cru’, which have been used since 1959.
9. The Grand National has a general resonance in the UK as a long-established event of worldwide renown and appeal, as well as a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in that country, forming part of the UK national consciousness.
10. Wines allowed to the national seal ‘Marque nationale’ can also carry one of the additional quality designations: ‘Vin classé’, ‘Premier cru’ or ‘Grand premier cru’, which have been used since 1959. These designations are awarded the individual wine after tasting by an official committee, which rates the wines on a 20-point scale:
11. the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Hungary have declared that they accept the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Article 35(2) and (3)(a) [1],the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden have declared that they accept the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Article 35(2) and (3)(b) [2],when making the abovementioned declarations, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Austria reserved the right to make provision in their national law that when a question concerning the validity or interpretation of an act referred to in Article 35(1) is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal is obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice.
12. the Kingdom of Spain has declared that it accepts the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Article 35(2) and (3)(a) [1],the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden have declared that they accept the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Article 35(2) and (3)(b) [2],when making the above mentioned declarations, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia reserved the right to make provision in their national law that when a question concerning the validity or interpretation of an act referred to in Article 35(1) is raised in a case pending before a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal is obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice.